I've had that handle on other forums since 2014. Today it makes even more sense given that Israeli citizens are fleeing the country in record numbers having witnessed the results of the Hanibal Directive.
The Israelis were among the most compliant populations in the world, and are now dropping dead suddenly in record numbers. They have learne the hard way that their government doesn't give a rat's ass about them.
Yes, but not even what is happening in Gaza, the West Bank or the Golan heights (and probably in East Jerusalem as well) is enough to make the religious zealots see what is going on. After all, they're being raptured soon(er).
I have not read anything about this either, though I no longer bother reading anything about that Kackling Carnivove Kamala. I loved watching Tulsi Gabbard knock her for a loop during the previous election 'debates'. But I thought you might find something interesting regarding edits to her wiki-page.
Statistician and educator par-excellence, Mathew Crawford, has coined his own "Mathew's Law: The more political the topic, the less reliable is Wikipedia" ... and his most recent post shows a high correlation between the number of edits to someone's Wiki-page (Kamela) and intentionally hidden changes in their social status. Excellent post — https://substack.com/@roundingtheearth/p-147466675
I have also seen other similar cases such as former Big Pharma executive and vocal critic of plandemic policies, Chris Martensnon (Peak Prosperity YouTube podcast) have his wiki-page completely removed, and you probably remember the recent changes to the definition of 'virus' so as to allow the current politically slanted "follow the plandemic science' mandates.
Mathew's Law is brilliant in its clarity and simplicity ... a subset of a larger pattern of intentional chaos including A.I. generated "answers" as well as social media "fact checks". Maybe Wikipedia is devolving to its lowest common denominator ... merely a more sophisticated form of mainstream media and social media. Here is an example from A.I. assisted search.
Just last week, I met up with NJ Election Advisor for a chat over beer, and according to NJEA's personal observations, New York state had mandated the jabs for public school teachers and students, as well as began retracting the medical license of any doctor who wrote medical exemptions against that medical interventions. Of course, they all had the 'freedom to choose' — between getting treatment or keeping a job or position as student in public schools paid for by their taxes. We went on talk about the status of medical quarantines. What I heard was horrifying. So I did a search on "Perplexity". Could not even log into my Chat GPT account.
"Me ...
Can you please give details and names regarding the legal challenge to what is perceived as government overreach with the 2022 New York state law that allows the state Health Department to involuntarily isolate individuals to control highly contagious diseases, such as COVID-19 ... and include more specific data regarding the current status of building and/or conversion of existing facilities to serve as quarantine camps.
Perplexity Pro ...
Answer
The legal challenge to New York's 2022 law allowing the Health Department to involuntarily isolate individuals has been a significant point of contention, particularly regarding concerns of government overreach. This law, known as Rule 2.13, was initially enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic to empower health authorities to manage the spread of highly contagious diseases.
Key Players in the Legal Challenge
Plaintiffs: The challenge has been spearheaded by Republican lawmakers, including:
State Senator George Borrello
Assemblyman Chris Tague
U.S. Representative Mike Lawler (formerly an Assembly member)
The organization Uniting NYS.
Defendants: The lawsuit targets:
Governor Kathy Hochul
The New York State Department of Health
New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Legal Proceedings and Court Decisions
Initial Ruling: In July 2022, Justice Ronald D. Ploetz of the State Supreme Court in Cattaraugus County ruled that the isolation and quarantine law was unconstitutional, citing violations of the separation of powers as it had not been enacted by the legislature but rather imposed by the executive branch.
Appeal and Reinstatement: On November 17, 2023, the Fourth Judicial Department appellate court overturned Ploetz's ruling, reinstating the law. The appellate court found that the Republican lawmakers did not adequately demonstrate harm or standing to bring the case, focusing on procedural aspects rather than the substantive constitutional issues raised in the original lawsuit. The court referenced the precedent set in Silver v. Pataki, which outlines the conditions under which legislators can claim standing in such cases.
Current Status: Following the appellate court's decision, the Republican lawmakers expressed their intent to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court. They argue that the law represents an overreach of executive power and undermines legislative authority.
Concerns Regarding Quarantine Camps
The discourse surrounding this law has been fueled by fears of "quarantine camps." However, state officials, including Governor Hochul, have firmly denied any plans to establish such facilities. The regulation allows for isolation in temporary housing but does not specifically mention the creation of camps. The term "temporary housing" could refer to various accommodations, such as hotel rooms, for individuals who might need to isolate away from communal living situations.
Legislative and Public Response
The controversy has sparked significant public debate about the balance between public health measures and individual liberties. Critics of the law, including the plaintiffs, argue that it grants excessive power to the state to detain individuals without due process, while supporters contend that it is a necessary tool for managing public health emergencies.
In summary, the legal challenge to New York's isolation and quarantine law continues to evolve, with significant implications for the state's approach to public health and individual rights. The outcome of the appeal to the Court of Appeals will be crucial in determining the future of this regulation and its enforcement."
Key take-away ... Similar to how "Public-Private Partnership" is a lipstick on a pig euphemism for "Fascist" (aha ... inspiration for a cartoon?), "Temporary Housing" may be the neweset euphemism for "Concentration Camps".
I no longer engage with politics...what's the point? There is simply no politician I would ever trust for much of anything....except to go along with the global terrorists planning my destruction and death.
"The very notion of government is evil. You don't need a person with authority to give you permission to do good deeds like help an old lady across the street, or give food to the poor. The only thing you need authority for is to do things that would make everyone say "THAT'S BAD!"
Gee whiz Anne - I'm wearing a hat, stars & stripes, donkey & elephant, in purple bold print "American Idiot" born in the USA! All my voting, caste that ballot, yrs I've banked on Who & why was JFK killed? To date, needless to say, not one President has afforded the truth. Truth is Israel. Now here we are genocides, talking heads, never ending wars for profit. A living nightmare I just "can't stand anymore". Over and out Woodstock generation Granny.
*How Israel Stole the Atomic Bomb and Killed JFK a Ryan Dawson film. #NUMEC on Musk's X.
eeek Frightening and horrible
More frightening than Trump?
Amen!
Hey, hey, hey ... it's NJ!
Not surprised we are both fans of Anne.
Along with Margaret Anna Alice, she is one of only 3 or 4 I can afford a paid subscription.
(It was my comment she quoted in her interview with James Corbett.)
Hmmm ... sub-comments seem to have flown under the radar.
https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/kamalamorphosis/comment/64998608
Great! And...looking forward to what you create for Walz
hopefully it will include: 'riots? what riots? it was all white supremacists in black face'.
Just listening to that bitch is insufferable.
INDEED!!!
"I'm SPEAKING!"
Yep. Snotty and condescending ON CAMERA! How do people not understand how horrible she is as a person?!
3 words: Trump Derangement Syndrome
They shouldn't be allowed to vote due to mental defect. 😉
AGREED!
"IsraHELL," indeed!
I've had that handle on other forums since 2014. Today it makes even more sense given that Israeli citizens are fleeing the country in record numbers having witnessed the results of the Hanibal Directive.
The Israelis were among the most compliant populations in the world, and are now dropping dead suddenly in record numbers. They have learne the hard way that their government doesn't give a rat's ass about them.
It must be a rude awakening!
Yes, but not even what is happening in Gaza, the West Bank or the Golan heights (and probably in East Jerusalem as well) is enough to make the religious zealots see what is going on. After all, they're being raptured soon(er).
No kidding. Unfortunately, there are plenty of people who are brainwashed by the TV. See Covid-19.
Exactly . . .
I can validate that statement.
I have a few of them in my own family. Unfortunately !!!
To many of those shots aren’t helping either.
Nope.
"She"Kamala Harris is a biological male and not and never will be a woman.
wouldn't surprise me, and would help explain why the BlueNoMatterWho™ Machine would select Kammie over Big Mike Obama
Kamel-toe
😂. Ughh.
Where have you heard this? Haven’t found anything along those lines, and I've been reading into her background recently.
Hi Anne.
I have not read anything about this either, though I no longer bother reading anything about that Kackling Carnivove Kamala. I loved watching Tulsi Gabbard knock her for a loop during the previous election 'debates'. But I thought you might find something interesting regarding edits to her wiki-page.
Statistician and educator par-excellence, Mathew Crawford, has coined his own "Mathew's Law: The more political the topic, the less reliable is Wikipedia" ... and his most recent post shows a high correlation between the number of edits to someone's Wiki-page (Kamela) and intentionally hidden changes in their social status. Excellent post — https://substack.com/@roundingtheearth/p-147466675
I have also seen other similar cases such as former Big Pharma executive and vocal critic of plandemic policies, Chris Martensnon (Peak Prosperity YouTube podcast) have his wiki-page completely removed, and you probably remember the recent changes to the definition of 'virus' so as to allow the current politically slanted "follow the plandemic science' mandates.
Mathew's Law is brilliant in its clarity and simplicity ... a subset of a larger pattern of intentional chaos including A.I. generated "answers" as well as social media "fact checks". Maybe Wikipedia is devolving to its lowest common denominator ... merely a more sophisticated form of mainstream media and social media. Here is an example from A.I. assisted search.
Just last week, I met up with NJ Election Advisor for a chat over beer, and according to NJEA's personal observations, New York state had mandated the jabs for public school teachers and students, as well as began retracting the medical license of any doctor who wrote medical exemptions against that medical interventions. Of course, they all had the 'freedom to choose' — between getting treatment or keeping a job or position as student in public schools paid for by their taxes. We went on talk about the status of medical quarantines. What I heard was horrifying. So I did a search on "Perplexity". Could not even log into my Chat GPT account.
"Me ...
Can you please give details and names regarding the legal challenge to what is perceived as government overreach with the 2022 New York state law that allows the state Health Department to involuntarily isolate individuals to control highly contagious diseases, such as COVID-19 ... and include more specific data regarding the current status of building and/or conversion of existing facilities to serve as quarantine camps.
Perplexity Pro ...
Answer
The legal challenge to New York's 2022 law allowing the Health Department to involuntarily isolate individuals has been a significant point of contention, particularly regarding concerns of government overreach. This law, known as Rule 2.13, was initially enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic to empower health authorities to manage the spread of highly contagious diseases.
Key Players in the Legal Challenge
Plaintiffs: The challenge has been spearheaded by Republican lawmakers, including:
State Senator George Borrello
Assemblyman Chris Tague
U.S. Representative Mike Lawler (formerly an Assembly member)
The organization Uniting NYS.
Defendants: The lawsuit targets:
Governor Kathy Hochul
The New York State Department of Health
New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Legal Proceedings and Court Decisions
Initial Ruling: In July 2022, Justice Ronald D. Ploetz of the State Supreme Court in Cattaraugus County ruled that the isolation and quarantine law was unconstitutional, citing violations of the separation of powers as it had not been enacted by the legislature but rather imposed by the executive branch.
Appeal and Reinstatement: On November 17, 2023, the Fourth Judicial Department appellate court overturned Ploetz's ruling, reinstating the law. The appellate court found that the Republican lawmakers did not adequately demonstrate harm or standing to bring the case, focusing on procedural aspects rather than the substantive constitutional issues raised in the original lawsuit. The court referenced the precedent set in Silver v. Pataki, which outlines the conditions under which legislators can claim standing in such cases.
Current Status: Following the appellate court's decision, the Republican lawmakers expressed their intent to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court. They argue that the law represents an overreach of executive power and undermines legislative authority.
Concerns Regarding Quarantine Camps
The discourse surrounding this law has been fueled by fears of "quarantine camps." However, state officials, including Governor Hochul, have firmly denied any plans to establish such facilities. The regulation allows for isolation in temporary housing but does not specifically mention the creation of camps. The term "temporary housing" could refer to various accommodations, such as hotel rooms, for individuals who might need to isolate away from communal living situations.
Legislative and Public Response
The controversy has sparked significant public debate about the balance between public health measures and individual liberties. Critics of the law, including the plaintiffs, argue that it grants excessive power to the state to detain individuals without due process, while supporters contend that it is a necessary tool for managing public health emergencies.
In summary, the legal challenge to New York's isolation and quarantine law continues to evolve, with significant implications for the state's approach to public health and individual rights. The outcome of the appeal to the Court of Appeals will be crucial in determining the future of this regulation and its enforcement."
Key take-away ... Similar to how "Public-Private Partnership" is a lipstick on a pig euphemism for "Fascist" (aha ... inspiration for a cartoon?), "Temporary Housing" may be the neweset euphemism for "Concentration Camps".
Take care Anne.
I no longer engage with politics...what's the point? There is simply no politician I would ever trust for much of anything....except to go along with the global terrorists planning my destruction and death.
You are wise, my friend!
I guess I pay some attention to see what they have in store for us and duck, if nothing else!
"The very notion of government is evil. You don't need a person with authority to give you permission to do good deeds like help an old lady across the street, or give food to the poor. The only thing you need authority for is to do things that would make everyone say "THAT'S BAD!"
- Larken Rose -
Anarchist
STILL as "mean-spirited" as ever, though . . .
Kamala is Not an American Born Citizen, neither is Obama, and how did Obama's Allegiance to Our Country work out for US(A)??
Like the other commenter mentioned; Anne can't wait to see your cartoon on Waltz! Really enjoy your artistry Anne, thank you!!
O-BOMB-a, ya mean: 7 Muslim countries at once!
Courtesy of the Nobel PEACE PRIZE winner!
Thank you so much, Jan! Will put Walz into the hopper and see what I come up with. I appreciate the suggestion.
Wait'll she starts channeling "Deep Thoughts, with Jack Handey" again!
LOL!!
"The significance of the passage of time"!
I want to add that I appreciate your sense of humor. Thanks for your work!
You are very welcome, Karen!
She will be kamaladjusted no doubt
#KommieKhameleonKamala. Fake right, go left.
it would be awesome if Weird Al Yankovick took a go at that!
ScKamala.
When I ran for mayor of SF killafornia in 2007, against Gruesome Gavin Gruesome Newsom, Ms ScKamala put me in jail.
She took away my Grasshopper taxicab business forevermore.
I wonder will they ever let me out of solitary isolation?
Regards from SF killafornia.
ScKamala kamaltoe gonna waltz you to death, for Big Harma, for prison and punishment, forevermore and ever after
Grasshopper, I have to check out your Substack more closely to learn more about your story.
She's unburdened of what has been!
;-) !!!
Gee whiz Anne - I'm wearing a hat, stars & stripes, donkey & elephant, in purple bold print "American Idiot" born in the USA! All my voting, caste that ballot, yrs I've banked on Who & why was JFK killed? To date, needless to say, not one President has afforded the truth. Truth is Israel. Now here we are genocides, talking heads, never ending wars for profit. A living nightmare I just "can't stand anymore". Over and out Woodstock generation Granny.
*How Israel Stole the Atomic Bomb and Killed JFK a Ryan Dawson film. #NUMEC on Musk's X.
Thank you for the film recommendation, Kathean!